Consultation, Screening and Delegation in Physical Therapy Case Study

Consultation, Screening and Delegation in Physical Therapy - Case Study Example Florida’s PT practice act requires practicing PT practitioners to meet the minimum requirements for safe practice. Thus, those presenting danger to patients or falling below minimum competency should be prohibited from practice according to Florida Physical Therapy statutes and rules as outlined in the legislative intent of Chapter 486. The PT involved the athletic trainer clinic manager in supervising and acting during intervention contrary to the requirement of using a PT assistant (PTA) as stated by the practice act. Moreover, the PT remained absent to offer direct supervision for direction of actions and consultation when the patient felt popping noise and severe pain in his shoulder. The unsupervised home exercises undertaken by the patient do not match the act requirement for physical therapy assessment involving licensed PT. The act also requires licensed PT to be of noble moral character unlike the remark made by the athletic trainer when the patient complained of seve re pain (The Florida Legislature, n.d.). Similarly, American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) guidelines provide resources and support to its members in establishing and sustaining efficient physical therapy practices in diverse settings. Adequate knowledge and appropriate skills in the administration and management of practice remain essential for APTA members whether practicing as an employee, owning a practice, managing a facility, or directing a department.